<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhetoric, part 1 (97)</title>
	<link>http://thewordnerds.org/2008/01/19/rhetoric-part-1-97/</link>
	<description>A podcast about words, language, and why we say the things we do</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan</title>
		<link>http://thewordnerds.org/2008/01/19/rhetoric-part-1-97/#comment-34609</link>
		<author>Tristan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewordnerds.org/2008/01/19/rhetoric-part-1-97/#comment-34609</guid>
					<description>Looking forward to this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Polo</title>
		<link>http://thewordnerds.org/2008/01/19/rhetoric-part-1-97/#comment-35669</link>
		<author>Antonio Polo</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewordnerds.org/2008/01/19/rhetoric-part-1-97/#comment-35669</guid>
					<description>Thank you very much for this new episode, it makes my english hearing in a good shape ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for this new episode, it makes my english hearing in a good shape ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Frame Game</title>
		<link>http://thewordnerds.org/2008/01/19/rhetoric-part-1-97/#comment-37118</link>
		<author>The Frame Game</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewordnerds.org/2008/01/19/rhetoric-part-1-97/#comment-37118</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cicero ain&#8217;t got no podcast...&lt;/strong&gt;

Occasionally I encounter people who dismiss my interest in frame language by saying something like, &#8220;Oh, that&#8217;s just rhetoric.  The Greeks and Romans invented that stuff centuries ago.&#8221;
To me that seems accurate, but also incomplete a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cicero ain&#8217;t got no podcast&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Occasionally I encounter people who dismiss my interest in frame language by saying something like, &#8220;Oh, that&#8217;s just rhetoric.  The Greeks and Romans invented that stuff centuries ago.&#8221;<br />
To me that seems accurate, but also incomplete a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Wing</title>
		<link>http://thewordnerds.org/2008/01/19/rhetoric-part-1-97/#comment-55237</link>
		<author>Brad Wing</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewordnerds.org/2008/01/19/rhetoric-part-1-97/#comment-55237</guid>
					<description>I really enjoyed this episode --  so much that I bought "Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student"     I have been reading it and working my way through the syllogisms, and am up to the point of the book where they analyze Rachel Carson's "The Obligation to Endure"   It's fascinating.  I had always thought that rhetoric would be boring but given the current political back-and-forth, I can analyze the points that the politicians are making better and see where the logic makes jumps or encourages the listener to draw conclusions that he/she can plausibly deny later.  Thanks for the pointer!

Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this episode &#8212;  so much that I bought &#8220;Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student&#8221;     I have been reading it and working my way through the syllogisms, and am up to the point of the book where they analyze Rachel Carson&#8217;s &#8220;The Obligation to Endure&#8221;   It&#8217;s fascinating.  I had always thought that rhetoric would be boring but given the current political back-and-forth, I can analyze the points that the politicians are making better and see where the logic makes jumps or encourages the listener to draw conclusions that he/she can plausibly deny later.  Thanks for the pointer!</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
